<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">donstu</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Advanced Engineering Research (Rostov-on-Don)</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Advanced Engineering Research (Rostov-on-Don)</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2687-1653</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Don State Technical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">donstu-553</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HUMANITIES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS OF MODERNIZATION IN RUSSIA</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Социально-философские аспекты модернизации России</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Драч</surname><given-names>Геннадий Владимирович</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Drach</surname><given-names>Gennady V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Южный федеральный университет.</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Southern Federal University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2012</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>12</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>2-2</issue><fpage>110</fpage><lpage>116</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Drach G.V., 2012</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Драч Г.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Drach G.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik-donstu.ru/jour/article/view/553">https://www.vestnik-donstu.ru/jour/article/view/553</self-uri><abstract><p>The idea on the Russian civilizational tradition specificity as the modernization key factor is prov ed. Only the cou ntries which considered th eir own cultural traditions (Japan, South Korea, China, India) have managed to successfu lly modernize themselves. The modernization of Russia cannot be reduced to the unilateral “liberaliza tion” that does not mean its waiver of democracy.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Обосновывается мысль о специфике российской цивилизационной традиции как важнейшем факторе моде рнизации. Только те страны, которые учитывали собственные культурные традиции (Япония, Южная Корея, Китай, Индия), смогли успешно модернизироваться. Модернизация России не может сводиться к одност оронней «либерализации», что не должно означать её отказа от демократии.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>модернизация</kwd><kwd>культура</kwd><kwd>трад иция</kwd><kwd>социальный опыт</kwd><kwd>либеральные ценности</kwd><kwd>демократия</kwd><kwd>рефлексия</kwd><kwd>свобода.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>moderni zation</kwd><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>tradition</kwd><kwd>social experience</kwd><kwd>liberal values</kwd><kwd>democracy</kwd><kwd>reflection</kwd><kwd>freedom.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Драч, Г. В. Модернизация России: pro et contra / Г. В. Драч // Будущее России: стратегии философского осмысления. — Санкт-Петербург: Изд-во СПб. гос. ун-та, 2011. — 457 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Drach, G. V. Modernizaciya Rossii: pro et contra / G. V. Drach // Budushhee Rossii: strategii filosofskogo osmy`sleniya. — Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo SPb. gos. un-ta, 2011. — 457 s. — In Russian.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Валлерстайн, И. Конец знакомого мира / И. Валлерстайн. — Москва: Логос, 2003. — 355с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vallerstajn, I. Konecz znakomogo mira / I. Vallerstajn. — Moskva: Logos, 2003. — 355 s. — In Russian.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ерыгин, А. Н. Традиционная и модернизирующаяся Россия в философии истории русского либерализма (К. Д. Кавелин, С. М. Соловьёв, Б. Н. Чичерин). Ч. I / А. Н. Ерыгин. — Ростовна-Дону: Изд-во Рост. ун-та, 2004. — 376 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ery`gin, A. N. Tradicionnaya i moderniziruyushhayasya Rossiya v filosofii istorii russkogo liberalizma (K. D. Kavelin, S. M. Solov`yov, B. N. Chicherin). Ch. I / A. N. Ery`gin. — Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo Rost. un-ta, 2004. — 376 s. — In Russian.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Новое понимание субъектности в различных контекстуальных полях. — Ростов-на-Дону: Изд-во ЮРИФ РАНХиГС, 2011. — 480 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novoe ponimanie sub``ektnosti v razlichny`x kontekstual`ny`x polyax. — Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YuRIF RANXiGS, 2011. — 480 s. — In Russian.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
