Optimal Control Method for a Lower Limb Exoskeleton with Elastic Elements
https://doi.org/10.23947/2687-1653-2025-25-3-186-196
EDN: HCPJJV
Abstract
Introduction. Modern development of exoskeletons opens new horizons for rehabilitation and improving the quality of life of people with limited mobility. The relevance of the study on methods of optimal control of exoskeletons is due to the growing demand in medicine and industry. However, there are numerous challenges related to the efficient control of exoskeletons, especially in the context of the integration of elastic elements. Topics related to optimal control and tuning of system parameters to reach maximum efficiency and user comfort remain insufficiently studied. The objective of this study is to develop a method of optimal control of a lower limb exoskeleton (LLE) with elastic elements while optimizing energy costs and accounting for external disturbances.
Materials and Methods. The LLE is represented by a simplified model of an inverted pendulum with elastic elements in the feet. The dynamic model of the LLE was developed using Lagrange equations. The optimal control method was based on the synthesis of a linear quadratic regulator designed to minimize energy costs. To account for the influence of external disturbances, a Kalman filter was integrated into the control loop. The parameters of the mathematical model of the LLE were obtained from published data. System simulation was performed in the Wolfram Mathematica environment.
Results. A method of optimal control of the LLE with elastic elements has been developed. This method optimizes energy costs while maintaining vertical equilibrium. The system was modeled using optimal terminal control, followed by optimal feedback control. During feedback control, key parameters affecting system stability were identified: spring stiffness and damping coefficients. Integration of the Kalman filter enabled compensation for external disturbances.
Discussion. The use of terminal control within the developed method reduced energy costs by 98% within a specified stabilization timeframe. Optimal values of spring stiffness and damping coefficients for obtaining the best system response were identified. The use of the optimal control method of the LLE in combination with the Kalman filter confirmed the effective compensation of external disturbances and noise, which provided the convergence of transient processes with minimal energy consumption.
Conclusion. The proposed method for achieving optimal control while minimizing energy costs is a promising solution in the field of control signal calculation required to ensure stability and determine the optimal energy cost function. This is especially true for medical rehabilitation tasks. These results may be useful for further research and development in the field of robotics and wearable devices.
About the Authors
D. DeebRussian Federation
Delshan Deeb, Postgraduate student, Teaching Assistant of the Department of Robotics, Mechatronics, Dynamics and Strength of Machines
14, Krasnokazarmennaya Str., Moscow, 111250
ScopusID 59000476600
I. V. Merkuryev
Russian Federation
Igor V. Merkuryev, Dr.Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Robotics, Mechatronics, Dynamics and Strength of Machines
14, Krasnokazarmennaya Str., Moscow, 111250
ScopusID 35422634900
References
1. Yatsun SF, Loktionova OG, Khalil Hamed Mohammed Hamood Al Manji, Yatsun AS, Karlov AE. Simulation of Controlled Motion of a Person When Walking in an Exoskeleton. Proceedings of Southwest State University. 2019;23(6):133–147. https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1560-2019-23-6-133-147
2. Habib Mohamad, Sadjaad Ozgoli. Online Gait Generator for Lower Limb Exoskeleton Robots: Suitable for Level Ground, Slopes, Stairs, and Obstacle Avoidance. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 2023;160:104319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104319
3. Bottin-Noonan J, Sreenivasa M. Model-Based Evaluation of Human and Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Interaction during Sit to Stand Motion. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). New York City: IEEE; 2021. P. 2063–2069. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561727
4. Shchurova EN, Prudnikova OG, Kachesova AA, Saifutdinov MS, Tertyshnaya MS. Improvement of Functional State of Patients after Spinal Cord Injury During Epidural Electrical Stimulation: Prospective Study. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2023;22(6):28–41. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-6-28-41
5. Nuckols RW, Sawicki GS. Impact of Elastic Ankle Exoskeleton Stiffness on Neuromechanics and Energetics of Human Walking across Multiple Speeds. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2020;17(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00703-4
6. Orekhov G, Lerner ZF. Design and Electromechanical Performance Evaluation of a Powered Parallel-Elastic Ankle Exoskeleton. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2022;7(3):8092–8099. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3185372
7. Hamed Jabbari Asl, Tatsuo Narikiyo, Michihiro Kawanishi. Neural Network-Based Bounded Control of Robotic Exoskeletons without Velocity Measurements. Control Engineering Practice. 2018;80:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.08.005
8. Jinghui Cao, Sheng Quan Xie, Raj Das. MIMO Sliding Mode Controller for Gait Exoskeleton Driven by Pneumatic Muscles. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. 2017;26(1):274–281. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2017.2654424
9. Madani T, Daachi B, Djouani K. Non-Singular Terminal Sliding Mode Controller: Application to an Actuated Exoskeleton. Mechatronics. 2016;33:136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.10.012
10. Rigatos G, Abbaszadeh M, Pomares J, Wira P. A Nonlinear Optimal Control Approach for a Lower-Limb Robotic Exoskeleton. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics. 2020;17(5):2050018. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843620500188
11. Jun Chen, Yuan Fan, Mingwei Sheng, Mingjian Zhu. Optimized Control for Exoskeleton for Lower Limb Rehabilitation with Uncertainty. In: Proc. Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). New York City: IEEE; 2019. P. 5121–5125. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2019.8833418
12. Rigatos G, Busawon K. Robotic Manipulators and Vehicles: Control, Estimation and Filtering. Cham: Springer; 2018. 734 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77851-8
13. Madhusudhan Venkadesan, Ali Yawar, Carolyn M Eng, Marcelo A Dias, Dhiraj K Singh, Steven M Tommasini, et al. Stiffness of the Human Foot and Evolution of the Transverse Arch. Nature. 2020;579:97–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2053-y
14. Juanjuan Zhang, Collins SH. The Passive Series Stiffness that Optimizes Torque Tracking for a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton in Human Walking. Frontiers in Neurorobotics. 2017;11:68. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2017.00068
15. Tsapenko V, Tereshchenko M, Tymchik G, Matvienko S, Shevchenko V. Analysis of Dynamic Load on Human Foot. In: Proc. IEEE 40th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO). New York City: IEEE; 2020. P. 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELNANO50318.2020.9088788.
A method for optimal control of a lower-limb exoskeleton with elastic elements in the feet is developed. It minimizes energy consumption while accounting for external disturbances and measurement noise. The method is based on the Lagrange model and control synthesis through solving the Riccati equation. It is shown that increasing the stabilization time significantly reduces energy consumption. An analysis of the effect of the stiffness and damping of the elastic elements has revealed a tradeoff between stabilization speed and overshoot. The use of a Kalman filter ensures robust state estimation and stable convergence in the presence of white noise.
Review
For citations:
Deeb D., Merkuryev I.V. Optimal Control Method for a Lower Limb Exoskeleton with Elastic Elements. Advanced Engineering Research (Rostov-on-Don). 2025;25(3):186-196. https://doi.org/10.23947/2687-1653-2025-25-3-186-196. EDN: HCPJJV